Showing posts with label Peter Fonda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Fonda. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

You Killed Your Momma, I'm All You Got Left.

Man, I keep thinking I'm kind of making headway, and then I remember a title I watched and forgot to make a note of in my list, and never wrote up, and find myself back at the beginning. Every time I get one ahead of myself, this happens. At this rate, I'll be twenty-odd films behind forever.


I watched The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things a loooong time ago. Really. I think it was around the same time as I watched The Brown Bunny, which would place it many months ago. So, I don't really remember thaat much about it.




It's a really cool title (taken, as it is, from the bible), which is probably why I have been drawn to it again and again over the years. Like books such as A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius and Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close, or films like Me And You And Everyone We Know, the title has stuck in my head and always  made me want to watch it (or read it, whatever), which is probably the primary reason I picked it up.


Now, I remember very little of it, except that I didn't think it was a particularly great film. There were good elements, sure, some good moments and interesting themes, and quite a noteworthy cast when you include Jeremy Renner, Ben Foster, Michael Pitt, Peter Fonda and even Marilyn Manson in a role in which you would miss him if you didn't know he was in the film. Asia Argento directed herself from her own screenplay based on the shorts of JT LeRoy.


Because she wrote it and directed it, I feel that it's fair to say that I didn't really feel any sympathy for her character. Yes, it could be that the character was entirely unsympathetic, but I think you needed some sympathy for her in order to truly feel for her son, but you didn't. No sympathy for her, and I then struggled to consistently find sympathy for the kid either. He was far too passive. Yes, I know he was, like, six and eleven for the whole film, but still. 


I think that might be a big problem. The two primary characters were either unsympathetic or passive. And the film was entirely too dour for the duration. I actually think it picked up and gained some edge, became a little more interesting and dynamic, towards the end when Argento's character was withdrawing and going a little nuts, but then the film ended, and that was it.


Really, I'm clutching at straws here. I don't really remember that much about it. I'm sorry. I don't. I remember what I felt about it after, and what I felt was 2 stars. So there you go.

Thursday, 7 January 2010

I'm Hip About Time.

Easy Rider is one of those films that someone of my age always hears about yet so few actually get around to seeing. When I pulled it off the shelf at the DVD store it was the third time I'd seen it sitting there, and I almost put it back when I saw something else alongside it I had been meaning to watch also. I don't know what it is about the film - it probably has something to do with the notoriety around the production, plus the fact that, let's be honest here, it's 40 years old. That's actually a pretty decent age. It's a long time ago.



How hot is Fonda's bike (the front one?) I want. Immediately.


The film has held up very well, though, I must say. I often find myself watching films that were termed groundbreaking so many years ago and being mildly unimpressed - probably because once that ground was broken it was turned and mined so often as to become old-hat by the time I turned up fifteen years later. Easy Rider has maintained its uniqueness, however, and I dare say a big chunk of its ability to retain it has to do with Dennis Hopper's complete lack of general sanity and the gratuitous use of drugs during the production of the film. Hell, they didn't even really take a crew or cast for most of it, just made it up as they went along (and still scored a Screenplay Oscar nom! Snap, boys.)


So, the film was directed by Hopper, produced by Peter Fonda (who both starred) and written by Hopper, Fonda and Terry Southern, who had made a name for himself with films like Dr Strangelove. (I'm not going to go into the politics of credit and all of the folklore regarding the making of this film. It's too hard. I'm going to go off the credit list. It is wildly entertaining - I've just been reading about it in Peter Biskind's Easy Riders Raging Bulls - check it out.) Billy (Hopper) and Wyatt a.k.a. Captain America (Fonda) are on a road trip of sorts, having scored a pile of cocaine that they had successfully resold for a good profit. They're heading to New Orleans for Mardi Gras with two motorbikes and a pile of weed. Along the way they pick up lawyer George (Jack Nicholson, who was totally not a star back then - weird, huh?), and the three of them just motor along the highways of rural America, dealing with discrimination from locals offended by their hippy look, getting stoned (a lot), dropping acid, just generally doing whatever it is they want to do. 


It's a marvelous road movie, because the ultimate goal (Mardi Gras) isn't really a goal at all - it's some strange ephemeral thing off in the distance that doesn't really mean anything to anyone, just happens to be there for motivation. Upon arrival, you realise the ultimate destination was where they were at any given point - it really was about the journey, about discovery, about exploration and experimentation and living the lives they deemed to be the most relevant for that day and age. And the ending - a brilliant and tragic ending.


The performances... well, Hopper's was manic, Fonda's was distant and Nicholson's was particularly restrained. They kind of improvised most of the film, so their performances were all pretty much pitch-perfect, considering they were drug-fucked as they wrote it and performed it. And it never really goes too crazy - it does threaten to veer off into extremes, but somehow Hopper and Fonda manage to reign it back in just in time.


Strangely timeless, for a film featuring hippies, made in the hippy era. Perhaps the reality of them inhabiting the mindset of those featured in the film allowed for a much truer representation than clever scripting, smart casting and more money would have allowed. Their own insanity was what saved the film. 4 stars.